Skip to content

YOUR WHITENESS IS SHOWING (An Open Letter to Certain White Women)

June 12, 2008

I decided to post this after finding out the author was actually White. Read and speak on it. Let us all do the right thing and get behind our Democrat!

Your Whiteness is Showing:
An Open Letter to Certain White Women
Who are Threatening to Withhold Support From Barack Obama in November

By Tim Wise

June 5, 2008

This is an open letter to those white women who, despite their proclamations of progressivism, and supposedly because of their commitment to feminism, are threatening to withhold support from Barack Obama in November. You know who you are.

I know that it’s probably a bad time for this. Your disappointment at the electoral defeat of Senator Hillary Clinton is fresh, the sting is new, and the anger that animates many of you–who rightly point out that the media was often sexist in its treatment of the Senator–is raw, pure and justified.

That said, and despite the awkward timing, I need to ask you a few questions, and I hope you will take them in the spirit of solidarity with which they are genuinely intended. But before the questions, a statement if you don’t mind, or indeed, even if (as I suspect), you will mind it quite a bit.

First, for those of you threatening to actually vote for John McCain and to oppose Senator Obama, or to stay home in November and thereby increase the likelihood of McCain winning and Obama losing (despite the fact that the latter’s policy platform is virtually identical to Clinton’s while the former’s clearly is not), all the while claiming to be standing up for women…

For those threatening to vote for John McCain or to stay home and increase the odds of his winning (despite the fact that he once called his wife the c-word in public and is a staunch opponent of reproductive freedom and gender equity initiatives, such as comparable worth legislation), all the while claiming to be standing up for women…

For those threatening to vote for John McCain or to stay home and help ensure Barack Obama’s defeat, as a way to protest what you call Obama’s sexism (examples of which you seem to have difficulty coming up with), all the while claiming to be standing up for women…

Your whiteness is showing.

When I say your whiteness is showing this is what I mean: You claim that your opposition to Obama is an act of gender solidarity, in that women (and their male allies) need to stand up for women in the face of the sexist mistreatment of Clinton by the press. On this latter point–the one about the importance of standing up to the media for its often venal misogyny–you couldn’t be more correct. As the father of two young girls who will have to contend with the poison of patriarchy all their lives, or at least until such time as that system of oppression is eradicated, I will be the first to join the boycott of, or demonstration on, whatever media outlet you choose to make that point. But on the first part of the above equation–the part where you insist voting against Obama is about gender solidarity–you are, for lack of a better way to put it, completely full of crap. And what’s worse is that at some level I suspect you know it. Voting against Senator Obama is not about gender solidarity. It is an act of white racial bonding, and it is grotesque.

If it were gender solidarity you sought, you would by definition join with your black and brown sisters come November, and do what you know good and well they are going to do, in overwhelming numbers, which is vote for Barack Obama. But no. You are threatening to vote not like other women–you know, the ones who aren’t white like you and most of your friends–but rather, like white men! Needless to say it is high irony, bordering on the outright farcical, to believe that electorally bonding with white men, so as to elect McCain, is a rational strategy for promoting feminism and challenging patriarchy. You are not thinking and acting as women, but as white people. So here’s the first question: What the hell is that about?

And you wonder why women of color have, for so long, thought (by and large) that white so-called feminists were phony as hell? Sister please…

Your threats are not about standing up for women. They are only about standing up for the feelings of white women, and more to the point, the aspirations of one white woman. So don’t kid yourself. If you wanted to make a statement about the importance of supporting a woman, you wouldn’t need to vote for John McCain, or stay home, thereby producing the same likely result–a defeat for Obama. You could always have said you were going to go out and vote for Cynthia McKinney. After all, she is a woman, running with the Green Party, and she’s progressive, and she’s a feminist. But that isn’t your threat is it? No. You’re not threatening to vote for the woman, or even the feminist woman. Rather, you are threatening to vote for the white man, and to reject not only the black man who you feel stole Clinton’s birthright, but even the black woman in the race. And I wonder why? Could it be…?

See, I told you your whiteness was showing.

And now for a third question, and this is the biggie, so please take your time with it: How is it that you have managed to hold your nose all these years, just like a lot of us on the left, and vote for Democrats who we knew were horribly inadequate–Kerry, Gore, Clinton, Dukakis, right on down the uninspiring line–and yet, apparently can’t bring yourself to vote for Barack Obama? A man who, for all of his shortcomings (and there are several, as with all candidates put up by either of the two major corporate parties) is surely more progressive than any of those just mentioned. And how are we to understand that refusal–this sudden line in the proverbial sand–other than as a racist slap at a black man? You will vote for white men year after year after year–and are threatening to vote for another one just to make a point–but can’t bring yourself to vote for a black man, whose political views come much closer to your own, in all likelihood, than do the views of any of the white men you’ve supported before. How, other than as an act of racism, or perhaps as evidence of political insanity, is one to interpret such a thing?

See, black folks would have sucked it up, like they’ve had to do forever, and voted for Clinton had it come down to that. Indeed, they were on board the Hillary train early on, convinced that Obama had no chance to win and hoping for change, any change, from the reactionary agenda that has been so prevalent for so long in this culture. They would have supported the white woman–hell, for many black folks, before Obama showed his mettle they were downright excited to do so–but you won’t support the black man. And yet you have the audacity to insist that it is you who are the most loyal constituency of the Democratic Party, and the one before whom Party leaders should bow down, and whose feet must be kissed?

Your whiteness is showing.

Look, I couldn’t care less about the Party personally. I left the Democrats twenty years ago when they told me that my activism in the Central America solidarity and South African anti-apartheid movements made me a security risk, and that I wouldn’t be able to get clearance to be in some parade with Governor Dukakis. Yeah, seriously. But for you to act as though you are the indispensible voters, the most important, the ones whose views should be pandered to, whose every whim should be the basis for Party policy, is not only absurd, it is also racist in that it, a) ignores and treats as irrelevant the much more loyal constituency of black folks, without whom no Democrat would have won anything in the past twenty years (and indeed the racial gap favoring the Democrats among blacks is about six times larger than the gender gap favoring them among white women, relative to white men); and b) demonstrates the mentality of entitlement and superiority that has been long ingrained in us as white folks–so that we believe we have the right to dictate the terms of political engagement, and to determine the outcome, and to get our way, simply because for so long we have done just that.

But that day is done, whether you like it or not, and you are now left with two, and only two choices, so consider them carefully: the first is to stand now in solidarity with your black brothers and sisters and welcome the new day, and help to push it in a truly progressive and feminist and antiracist direction, while the second is to team up with white men to try and block the new day from dawning. Feel free to choose the latter. But if you do, please don’t insult your own intelligence, or ours, by insisting that you’ve done so as a radical political act.

9 Comments leave one →
  1. June 12, 2008 2:30 pm

    Yooo. It’s been sometime since I wrote you. But after seeing this artilcle I had to reach out. I JUST got word of your man Tim Wise a couple of months ago….he’s a deep character. Here’s a speech he gave on white privilege.

  2. June 12, 2008 3:27 pm

    That pretty much sums it up. I’ve gone on some of these crazy Hillary supporter blogs and they’re all about boycotting the election and/or voting for McCain, which I’m sorry, makes you a Republican in my eyes. If you vote Republican, I don’t care what your motive is, you’re a Republican. What’s next? Are you going to blame Obama for turning you into a Republican? Are you going to blame him for destroying your convictions that conservative initiatives against a woman’s right to choose are morally wrong? What’s your point? Don’t let yourself become even more oppressed than you already are by voting for McCain. If you do this you’ll be acting purely on irrational emotions, which is one of the most pernicious stereotypes of women: that they act on emotion instead of reasoning things out. And anyway, Hillary was using YOU, loyal supporter, as leverage to stay in the election. She said that the only reason she stayed in was because of you. She used you like any shrewd politician would. It’s just that Barack Obama outsmarted her. It’s time for you to take initiative and support Obama and stop blaming him for all of society’s ills. Tim Wise, you’re absolutely right. And to see my CARTOONS click on my name link.

  3. goodtimepolitics permalink
    June 12, 2008 11:28 pm

    But does Obama tell them who he is?

    http://goodtimepolitics.com/2008/06/12/obamas-sister-says-he-was-muslim/

  4. June 13, 2008 6:16 am

    thx for the video

  5. goodtimepolitics permalink
    June 14, 2008 12:44 am

    Standby your democrats you say after they talk like this! :)

    http://goodtimepolitics.com/2008/06/13/holding-endorsement-of-obama-cause-he-may-be-connected-to-terrorist/

  6. June 22, 2008 12:01 am

    Why can’t I be as proud of my whiteness as your asshole-ness?
    You do realize that you are a misogynistic prick right?
    Obama? Really?
    Where is his support for the queer nation?
    Or is my lesbianism showing?
    Just be white and elite, like you are? So I can feel better.
    How dare you think that the colour of my skin means anything as long as it’s attached to a vagina.

  7. goodtimepolitics permalink
    October 10, 2008 12:31 am

    I think your black is showing and all I see is those white teeth! Want to be racist, I can help you out alittle! See it goes both ways!

  8. October 30, 2008 10:09 pm

    goodtimes wtf are you talking about?! lol

    Tim you owned….. this couldn’t have been released at a better time this should be like everywhere.

  9. dieheilige permalink
    November 3, 2008 10:49 am

    hey – I was a Hillary supporter, but definitely – already – voted for Barack Obama. not all of us are the ‘crazy Hillary bloggers’, as you say. Three things, though – 1) I will always have voted for whoever the Democratic nominee was … but it sure didn’t help that when I wore my ‘Hillary’ button to an Obama rally, I got all sorts of rude, belligerent epithets hurled at me (ahem, that doesn’t help the cause, Obama people … don’t alienate the Hillary supporters); 2) I hope that all Obama supporters would have been JUST as supportive of Hillary had she won the Democratic nomination … ? & 3) It’s really unnecessary (and sexist) to attach all of those pictures of Hillary on to this blog – really, what’s the point? if you want the ‘whiteness is showing’ voters to come out for your cause, don’t insult their hero. Idiot.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 86 other followers

%d bloggers like this: